Netflix, battling with subscriptions, lays off about 150 workers.

Mr. Musk, the world’s richest male, continued developing confusion close to his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter on Tuesday, even as the social media corporation tried out to continue to keep the deal on system. Early in the morning, the billionaire tweeted that “this offer can’t go forward” until finally he acquired a lot more details about the volume of spam and fake accounts on the platform.

A few hours later on, Twitter stated it was “committed to finishing the transaction on the agreed cost and terms as promptly as practicable.” It urged its shareholders to again the bid by Mr. Musk, who appeared to be carrying out a general public tweet-by-tweet negotiation even even though he experienced struck the blockbuster offer to obtain Twitter past thirty day period.

Mr. Musk’s significantly skeptical — and erratic — feedback about the takeover have stored investors, bankers and Twitter by itself guessing about his motives. Some analysts figure that the 50-yr-previous is striving to travel down the acquisition price or wander absent from the deal completely. Several ended up unnerved by his solutions, with industry-shifting pronouncements produced off the cuff at conferences or in emoji-laden tweets in the center of the night.

Still his opinions are in preserving with Mr. Musk’s longtime techniques of operation, where he frequently wings it in the largest moments, eschews experts and depends pretty much entirely on his very own counsel. Decades back, he stated that he experienced stopped generating organization ideas. And persons near to Mr. Musk have reported that he experienced no approach in any way when he piped up with an offer to get Twitter past thirty day period.

“I consider all of this is just him earning a great deal of sound and exhibiting the sort of complications that he would lead to for the enterprise if they had been to attempt to litigate this,” explained Ann Lipton, a professor of corporate governance at Tulane Legislation College.

Twitter’s shares fell 8 p.c on Monday and rose additional than 3 percent on Tuesday. They were hovering at $38 a share, far underneath the $54.20 a share that Mr. Musk agreed to fork out for the firm and underneath where it traded just before the billionaire originally unveiled in March that he had purchased a major stake in Twitter.

Driving the scenes, the two sides are continuing with the deal: They jointly place out a regulatory submitting on Tuesday. Renegotiating a offer would not be straightforward for Mr. Musk. In addition to a $1 billion separation cost, the offer with Twitter contains a “specific efficiency clause,” which presents the organization the right to sue him and force him to comprehensive the deal so long as the personal debt financing he has corralled stays intact.

Mr. Musk, who also prospects the rocket corporation SpaceX and the electric powered carmaker Tesla, did not instantly answer to a request for remark. Twitter’s board explained in a assertion: “The board and Mr. Musk agreed to a transaction at $54.20 for every share. We imagine this arrangement is in the most effective fascination of all shareholders. We intend to close the transaction and implement the merger arrangement.”

Mr. Musk’s newest remarks about the Twitter deal heart on the challenge of bogus accounts on the system. Twitter has very long mentioned in regulatory filings that fewer than 5 % of its accounts are faux — a determine that Mr. Musk claimed is tough to feel. In a tweet published at 3:32 a.m. Japanese time on Tuesday, Mr. Musk mentioned the figure could be nicely earlier mentioned 20 percent, devoid of furnishing information and facts to support his assert.

“My present was primarily based on Twitter’s S.E.C. filings currently being correct,” Mr. Musk said in the concept.

Section of the motive that the difficulty of bogus accounts has arrive to the forefront now is that Mr. Musk did not conduct owing diligence on Twitter ahead of agreeing to acquire the enterprise. Likely prospective buyers usually go to substantial lengths to review a target’s business, shoppers, advancement potential and stock rate prior to producing an offer you. But according to a regulatory filing from the business on Tuesday, Mr. Musk advised Twitter that finishing because of diligence on the social media company was not needed in advance of signing an agreement.

In the filing, Twitter also warned that “if the merger is not finished, and dependent on the conditions that trigger the merger not to be finished, the selling price of our common stock could decline noticeably.” Deal uncertainty can harm firm morale and insert to personnel turnover.

On Tuesday, two vice presidents and one particular office head notified colleagues they have been departing the firm for new prospects, a Twitter representative stated. The departures were previously described by Bloomberg.

“If the bot figure is so important to his assessment of the value of the company, he should have done his due diligence on it before signing the deal,” said Erik Gordon, a professor of business at the University of Michigan. “And he should have added an explicit representation about bots to the contract.”

Mr. Musk has been building up the pressure on Twitter with his public comments questioning the deal. He began last Friday, tweeting that his purchase was “temporarily on hold” until he could get more details about the volume of spam and fake accounts on the platform. He later followed up saying that he was still “committed” to the deal.

Over the weekend, he tweeted that Twitter’s legal department had “called to complain” that he violated a nondisclosure agreement by discussing its bot sample size of 100. Mr. Musk’s deal with Twitter also has a non-disparagement clause that prohibits him from tweeting negatively about the transaction.

Then at a technology conference in Miami on Monday, Mr. Musk said striking a deal for Twitter at a lower price was “not out of the question” considering the questions about spam and fake accounts.

“The more questions I ask, the more my concerns grow,” Mr. Musk said at the event. “So you know, at the end of the day, acquiring it has to be fixable with a reasonable time frame and without revenues collapsing along the way.”

He added that it was a “material adverse misstatement” if Twitter said it has less than 5 percent of fake or spam accounts but the figure is actually significantly more.

“Material adverse change” clauses are used by buyers to get out of or renegotiate deals if there has been serious harm to a business. But such charges rarely prevail in court. Twitter’s bot count is unlikely to qualify as a material adverse statement, lawyers said, since Twitter has publicly disclosed similar figures quarterly and there would be no clear change to evaluate. And Twitter also cautions in its regulatory filings its bot estimates may be “higher” than it estimates.

Twitter’s deal contract has eight pages of “representations”: effectively promises about the state of the company at the time of the merger, though none pertain directly to its count of bots.

On Monday, Parag Agrawal, Twitter’s chief executive, also posted a lengthy thread detailing how the company calculates its number of bots. He said the company’s internal estimates for the last four quarters “were all well under 5 percent.”

Mr. Musk later responded to Mr. Agrawal’s tweet thread with a poop emoji. He also tweeted at the Securities and Exchange Commission, indicating that he wants the agency to look into the deal. (Mr. Musk has previously been the subject of S.E.C. inquiries.)

In its filing on Tuesday, Twitter also noted the significant challenges it weighed in deciding whether to accept Mr. Musk’s bid. Bret Taylor, Twitter’s chairman, spoke with several institutional shareholders who recommended that the board consider Mr. Musk’s proposal against the risks of pressing forward as a public company.

Twitter also said that while its management and bankers received interest from other “financial sponsors and institutional investors,” none of the interested parties put forward a specific counterproposal.

Ele Klein, co-chairman of the global shareholder activism group at the law firm Schulte Roth & Zabel, said Mr. Musk’s shenanigans have put Twitter’s board in a bind.

“It then becomes a question of, if you’re the company, even though you have a really great fact pattern, how long do you want to spend fighting,” Mr. Klein said. “Life’s too short to fight with Elon Musk.”

Mike Isaac contributed reporting.